Many health care deliverers
seem to have forgotten that a patient is a whole person. This
is because we live in a nation filled with health professionals
who have been greatly influenced by the Western philosophy of
medicine.
The major focus of this philosophy is identifying external agents
of disease and developing the weapons to be used against them.
For example, the discovery of antibiotics enabled us to overcome
many infectious diseases.
This convinced many people that technological
intervention was worth it, no matter what the cost.
Although allopathic medicine (Western techniques) appears to be
successful in dealing with trauma and sophisticated surgery like
organ transplants, it has shown minimal success with the autoimmune
diseases, chronic pain, chronic dysfunctions.
Therefore, as a nation, we have become mere infants in the conquering
of our own health. Population continues its expansive growth;
viruses and bacteria flourish; toxins accumulate; and the demand
for allopathic health care and dispensing of expensive chemical drigs are increasing the stress on our medical resources.
The events of history, which led to our current medical system,
have been written about in many books (see bibliography). The
period between 1920 and the 1960s is considered to be the "lost
decades of herbal healing." Medical schools ignored herbs,
while pharmaceutical drugs replaced herbal formulas in our country's
drug stores.
In 1820, two-thirds
of the treatments in the U.S. Pharmacopoeia involved botanicals.
In 1880, the figure was almost three-quarters. However, although
a fourth of our modern medicines are still derived from plants,
almost everyone has been conditioned to expect a "silver
bullet" chemical as a cure.
If you take a look at current medicines, you will find that many
of them begin with the prefix "anti," which means "in
opposition to" or "counteracting".
These medicines have proven to be life-saving in many acute, short-term
situations, but the question is, when it comes to long-term chronic
illnesses and diseases, shouldn't we use, instead, something more
natural and safer for the body?
Therefore, modern medicine can play a very large part in diagnosis
and treatment. Before a person is treated for an ailment, modern
technology needs to be utilized, so that the professional knows
exactly what he/she is dealing with. For example, instead of just
suggesting feverfew for chronic headaches, a legitimate holistic
medical professional should expect the patient to undergo diagnostic
treatments (i.e., MRI, CT scans, x-rays, and more) to rule out
serious causes (brain tumors, weak vessels, etc.) before developing
an individualized treatment plan.
We need both past and present knowledge to make the best decisions.
Imagine a physician's office that includes individual rooms for
treatment/diagnostic purposes, massage, botanical teaching, acupuncture,
counseling, exercise, biofeedback, etc.
PATIENTS NEED TO BE TAUGHT THE TECHNIQUES FOR STAYING WELL, NOT ILL!
Fortunately, a healing revolution is occurring in our country.
Our current health care system is being challenged by alternative
health care disciplines, which rely on more balanced, less invasive
ways to maintain health. It is clear that some of the nation's
larger institutions are incorporating alternatives into the medical
industry. Alternative medical practitioners (who
were scarce 20 years ago) are beginning to create schools and
professional associations. Out of the 125 medical
schools in this country, 34 are offering courses in alternative
medicine--such as yoga, meditation, biofeedback, hypnosis, therapeutic
touch, and chiropractic care. These schools include Harvard, Yale,
Wayne State, and Johns Hopkins.
The solution is simple in theory.
By combining Western medical philosophy with the know-how of the
Eastern professionals through training, education, and respect
for both belief systems, consumers could make informed choices
about their health.